For Christmas I got a fascinating gift from a good friend - my very own "best-selling" book.
"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (excellent title) bears my name and my picture on its cover, and it has radiant reviews.
Yet it was entirely written by AI, with a couple of simple triggers about me provided by my good friend Janet.
It's an interesting read, and very amusing in parts. But it also meanders rather a lot, and is somewhere in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.
It imitates my chatty style of writing, however it's also a bit recurring, and very verbose. It may have surpassed Janet's prompts in collating data about me.
Several sentences begin "as a leading technology journalist ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.
There's also a mysterious, repeated hallucination in the type of my cat (I have no pets). And oke.zone there's a metaphor on practically every page - some more random than others.
There are dozens of business online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.
When I called the primary executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had sold around 150,000 personalised books, primarily in the US, given that rotating from assembling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.
A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The company uses its own AI tools to create them, based on an open source large language design.
I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who created it, ai-db.science can buy any more copies.
There is presently no barrier to anyone developing one in anybody's name, consisting of celebrities - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around violent content. Each book includes a printed disclaimer mentioning that it is fictional, created by AI, christianpedia.com and created "solely to bring humour and delight".
Legally, the copyright belongs to the firm, however Mr Mashiach stresses that the product is intended as a "customised gag gift", and the books do not get offered even more.
He wishes to widen his variety, creating different categories such as sci-fi, and perhaps offering an autobiography service. It's designed to be a light-hearted type of customer AI - offering AI-generated goods to human clients.
It's likewise a bit scary if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least because it most likely took less than a minute to produce, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound much like me.
Musicians, authors, artists and stars worldwide have revealed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then churn out similar content based upon it.
"We must be clear, when we are speaking about data here, we actually mean human creators' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which for AI firms to respect developers' rights.
"This is books, this is articles, this is pictures. It's artworks. It's records ... The whole point of AI training is to discover how to do something and after that do more like that."
In 2023 a tune featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms due to the fact that it was not their work and they had actually not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's creator attempting to nominate it for a Grammy award. And although the artists were fake, it was still wildly popular.
"I do not think the use of generative AI for creative functions ought to be banned, however I do think that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on individuals's work without permission ought to be banned," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be really effective however let's construct it ethically and relatively."
OpenAI states Chinese competitors using its work for their AI apps
DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking
China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and dents America's swagger
In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have selected to obstruct AI developers from trawling their online material for training functions. Others have actually decided to work together - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for instance.
The UK government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would permit AI developers to utilize creators' material on the web to assist establish their models, unless the rights holders pull out.
Ed Newton Rex describes this as "insanity".
He explains that AI can make advances in locations like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.
"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and destroying the livelihoods of the nation's creatives," he argues.
Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your house of Lords, is likewise highly against eliminating copyright law for AI.
"Creative markets are wealth developers, 2.4 million jobs and an entire lot of pleasure," states the Baroness, who is also a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.
"The government is weakening among its best carrying out markets on the unclear promise of growth."
A federal government representative stated: "No move will be made up until we are definitely positive we have a useful plan that provides each of our goals: increased control for right holders to assist them accredit their material, access to high-quality material to train leading AI models in the UK, and more transparency for ideal holders from AI designers."
Under the UK federal government's brand-new AI strategy, classicalmusicmp3freedownload.com a nationwide information library containing public information from a large variety of sources will also be made available to AI researchers.
In the US the future of federal guidelines to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.
In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to increase the safety of AI with, to name a few things, companies in the sector required to share information of the functions of their systems with the US federal government before they are released.
But this has actually now been repealed by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do instead, however he is stated to want the AI sector to face less policy.
This comes as a number of lawsuits versus AI companies, and particularly against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been taken out by everybody from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.
They claim that the AI companies broke the law when they took their content from the web without their authorization, and used it to train their systems.
The AI business argue that their actions fall under "fair use" and are for that reason exempt. There are a number of factors which can constitute fair usage - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector nerdgaming.science is under increasing examination over how it collects training information and whether it ought to be paying for it.
If this wasn't all enough to ponder, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the past week. It ended up being the a lot of downloaded free app on Apple's US App Store.
DeepSeek declares that it developed its technology for a fraction of the rate of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has raised security issues in the US, and pipewiki.org threatens American's present dominance of the sector.
As for me and a career as an author, I think that at the moment, if I truly want a "bestseller" I'll still have to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the present weakness in generative AI tools for bigger projects. It is full of inaccuracies and hallucinations, and it can be rather tough to read in parts since it's so verbose.
But offered how rapidly the tech is evolving, I'm not exactly sure how long I can remain confident that my substantially slower human writing and editing skills, are better.
Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the greatest developments in international technology, with analysis from BBC reporters all over the world.
Outside the UK? Sign up here.
1
How an AI-written Book Shows why the Tech 'Horrifies' Creatives
Aurelio Darling edited this page 2025-02-03 16:03:05 +00:00